How Outrageous Was Judge Vaughn Walker's Sodomarriage Edict?

This outrageous:

Appellants’ motion for a stay of the district court’s order of August 4, 2010 pending appeal is GRANTED. The court sua sponte orders that this appeal be expedited pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 2. The provisions of Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(a) (pertaining to grants of time extensions) shall not apply to this appeal. This appeal shall be calendared during the week of December 6, 2010, at The James R. Browning Courthouse in San Francisco, California.

My friends, when the Ninth Circus slaps down a federal district court judge for being too much of a lawless, hard-left despot, it makes you wonder what am American constitutionalist appellate court would do to him.

Or it may mean that they're not gonna let all that lawless, hard-left despotic glory go to a mere district court hack pretender; no, they want that "landmarking" for themselves:

The previously established briefing schedule is vacated. The opening brief is now due September 17, 2010. The answering brief is due October 18, 2010. The reply brief is due November 1, 2010. In addition to any issues appellants wish to raise on appeal, appellants are directed to include in their opening brief a discussion of why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of Article III standing. See Arizonans For Official English v. Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 66 (1997).

You can just see the same slap-down happening a few months from now, only one level up, cantcha?  Because ain't no way that Justice Kennedy is going to let all that lawless, hard-left despotic glory go to a mere bunch of appellate court hack pretenders; this is the homophilic watershed he's been waiting for for twenty-two years with which to put himself at the top of the judicial history books, right along side....Roger Taney and William Brennan.

Oh, well.  Guess all those brown-hatters and lesbyterians will have to keep, um, sinning in sin.  Like they would really know the difference.