Donkstremism

Does this man sound like an extremist to you?

Where is Mitch Ceasar?

In the middle of a huge election season in arguably the most important Democratic county in America and the party chairman is nowhere to be found. In addition to a slew of local races, the Democrats have big contests involving Alex Sink, the Democratic nominee in the governor's race; Congressman Kendrick Meek in his Senate bid; and incumbent U.S. Rep. Ron Klein, who is fighting for his political life against Allen West.

Yet little to nothing has been heard from the party, except some recent photos that show Ceasar's second in command, Diane Glasser, and other party leaders schmoozing with Meek opponent Charlie Crist.

Even the corresponding secretary for the Democratic Executive Committee, Alex Johnson, is dumbfounded...

Hmm; sounds like Waldo so far.  Might there be a reason for that?

-- "He is really one of the most unsavory characters I've ever met in my life. He doesn't care about the party. Mitch only cares about Mitch."

-- "To me, he's a cancer. I think he's the stem of where your cancer grows, and then it spreads out to the little cities, to the county, to whoever he decides to pursue."

-- "He's cheap, he's deceitful, he uses his minions to spy on people. He talks about these things in the office; he sends his spies out. He's a master of the game plan... I am an independent now, it made me so sick."

-- "I really believed that the Democratic Party was better, that it was really grass-roots, that it cared about people. I didn't know it was all about special interests. Now I do."

And those special interests are all leftwing extremists.  Or "Obamunists" for short.  That's what makes the Dems' tiresomely predictable resort to hurling the "E" word at Republicans so risible.  The Democrat Party runs up more debt in Barack Obama's first two years than in the country's first two centuries, nationalizes several entire industries, lets Mexican drug cartels effectively occupy the southernmost quarter of Arizona and sues the Brewer Administration to bar it from enforcing federal immigration law, wages a tireless war against domestic energy including shutting down exploration in the Gulf of Mexico, and so on and so on and so on, all against the vehement will of the American people - but it's REPUBLICANS who're the "extremists" for standing with the American people against the Democrat Party.

Oh, I'm sorry, I neglected to mention anti-Semitism Democrat multiculti foreign policy:

Sorry, folks, Kaukab Siddique has tenure and he's got "freedom of hate speech".  And we do NOT have the freedom of speech to even mention that this "professor" is an Islamic Fundamentalist.  That would be "hateful" and "bigoted" and "Islamophobic" and...."extreme", y'see.

The article doesn't mention that he's a Democrat, but c'mon, folks, is the question even really necessary?  And will any Democrat condemn Siddique in any meaningful way or sense?  Heck, those views are in the mainstream of Democrat Party thought.

Of course, none of this is really new; it's just that Donk extremism has never before been this open, overt, and undisguised.  Almost as if they thought the coast was clear after 2008, and now think they have nothing left to lose in 2010.

Or, in other words, We, The People, have finally paid attention:

Likely voters in battleground districts see extremists as having a more dominant influence over the Democratic Party than they do over the GOP.

This result comes from The Hill 2010 Midterm Election Poll, which found that 44% of likely voters say the Democratic Party is more dominated by its extreme elements, whereas 37% say it’s the Republican Party that is more dominated by extremists...

Honestly, after the past twenty months of "Fuck You Government" I'm mildly amazed that that sentiment isn't at least a clear majority.  Really, it ought to be unanimous.

But I'll take a seven point perspicacity advantage - especially if it lasts for years and years to come.