Recently in Outside The Beltway Category
|
|
|
Insider Report from Newsmax.com Headlines (Scroll down for complete
stories): 1. California Bill Outlaws Gay
Counseling A bill before the California Senate would
make it a crime to counsel gay young people about changing their sexual
orientation. California Senate Bill 1172 bans
"reparative therapy" administered to patients under age 18 by therapists,
psychologists, counselors, and parents. Violators could be subject to arrest,
fines, and possible jail time. The sponsor of the bill, Democrat Ted Lieu,
said it helps raise public awareness of the "junk science" that purports to
change a person's sexual orientation. "Under the guise of a California license,
some therapists are taking advantage of vulnerable people by pushing
dangerous sexual orientation-change efforts," he said after the bill passed
out of the California Senate Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee
on Tuesday. But Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific
Justice Institute of Sacramento, vows to challenge the constitutionality of
the bill if it passes the legislature. "This legislation is a grotesque violation
of the rights of parents over their children," he said after testifying
against the bill. "It specifically prohibits any child under
the age of 18 who struggles with homosexuality from getting any kind of
professional counseling at all. In fact, it also subjects parents to possibly
having their children permanently removed from them if it is found that the
parents were not accepting of a child's perception of being homosexual and
the parents want the child to get counseling." The bill states that reparative therapy
poses "critical health risks" to gay people, including "shame,"
"disappointment," and "increased self-hatred." But the California Psychological
Association, the California Association for Licensed Professional Clinical
Counselors, and the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapy
oppose the bill, terming it an unwarranted intrusion. "The fact that this bill is opposed by many
of the professional organizations that normally are quite liberal on
homosexuality indicates how extreme this legislation is," Peter Sprigg,
senior fellow for cultural studies at the Family Research Council, told CNS
News. "It really flies in the face of a
fundamental ethical principle within the counseling profession, which is the
autonomy of the client in determining the goals for treatment." 2. Federal Report: 'Green Jobs'
Include Trash Collectors A recent Bureau of Labor Statistics report
counts 3.1 million green jobs in the U.S. economy, but the BLS defines these
jobs so broadly that it includes even school bus drivers and trash collectors
as "green" workers. "Cheerleaders for the president's program
of green jobs mandates and spending point to the study as confirmation of
green jobs' economic importance," said David W. Kreutzer, Research Fellow in
Energy Economics and Climate Change in the Center for Data Analysis at The
Heritage Foundation. Kreutzer takes issue with the report as "an
effort to count the number of green jobs as a way of justifying subsidies and
mandates." "Just a little digging into the data shows
that only a small fraction of the 3.1 million jobs could have been created by
green subsidies and mandates." The BLS study defines green jobs as those
"in businesses that produce goods or provide services that benefit the
environment or conserve natural resources." Using this definition, the BLS counts
43,658 jobs in steel mills as green because the industry uses scrap steel and
can be classified as an active recycler. Similarly, 27 percent of all paper mill
jobs, 30,473, are counted as green because mills use recycled paper. Steel and paper mill jobs "do not fit in
with the rhetoric of the new, clean economy that green jobs proponents use to
justify expensive green policies -- the sort of policies that brought the
Solyndra debacle," Kreutzer writes in the Heritage Foundation report. The electric power generation industry is
said to have 44,152 green jobs, but only 4,700 are in renewable power
generation. The nuclear power industry has 35,755 green
jobs, according to the BLS, but since no new plants have been built in the
past 30 years, those jobs "are clearly not the result of any green energy or
green jobs programs," Kreutzer points out. Other jobs considered to be green by the
BLS include those in used merchandise stores (106,865 jobs), waste collection
(116,293), school and employee bus transportation (160,896), leisure and
hospitality (22,510), office furniture sales (14,888), septic tank cleaning
and portable toilet servicing (13,313), radio and television broadcasting
(9,297), fruit and tree nut farming (12,176), and social advocacy
organizations (20,704). Kreutzer concludes that the BLS's
"definition and collection mechanisms raise serious questions about how green
those jobs are and whether their count can be a useful measure of the
importance of green jobs in America's economy and the effectiveness of green
jobs policies." 3. Taxes Now Higher Than Food,
Clothing, Shelter Costs This year Americans will pay more in total
taxes than they spend for food, clothing, and shelter combined, illustrating
what the Tax Foundation calls the "growing cost of government." Total outlays for taxes in 2012 will be
about $4.04 trillion, which is $152 billion more than Americans will spend on
housing, food, and clothing. "Relative to the basic cost of living,
taxes have increased considerably in recent decades," the foundation states
in a new report. In 1929, Americans paid $10.1 billion in
taxes while outlays for food, clothing, and shelter totaled $41.6 billion. The cost of those essentials surpassed tax
collections every year after that until 1981, when the $858.3 billion paid in
taxes narrowly surpassed the $854.4 spent on food, clothing, and shelter. Seven years later, in 1988, taxes again
surpassed outlays on essentials, and they remained larger than food,
clothing, and shelter costs every year until 2009, when the economic slowdown
reduced tax collections. But after a two-year gap, taxes are once
again trumping spending for food, clothing, and housing. The Tax Foundation also points out that
transfer payments -- government outlays that Americans can use to purchase
food, clothing, and housing, among other things -- have increased considerably
in recent decades. In 1929, transfer payments accounted for
just 0.5 percent of private outlays on food, clothing, and shelter. By 1965,
when Medicare began, the percentage had grown to about 11 percent. Today it
is close to 35 percent. "Consumption data, which comes from the
Bureau of Economic Analysis, includes private consumption that is paid for
with government transfer payments from assistance programs such as Medicare,"
Kevin Duncan of the Tax Foundation observes. "This leads to double counting, as the
taxes that finance these programs and the increased consumption that those
taxes fund are included in both tax and consumption figures, respectively. "Despite these limitations, the comparison
of tax costs to the basic cost of living provides a useful illustration of
the growing cost of government." 4. U.S. Immigration Policies Raise
Risk of Terrorist Attack A troubling report discloses that U.S.
immigration policies continue to permit the entry of aliens from nations
potentially harboring terrorists -- including even the Islamic Republic of
Iran. The report from the Center for Immigration
Studies (CIS) says that since 2001, more than 2.5 million people have been
allowed to enter the United States from 16 Muslim nations in and around the
Middle East. The CIS examines the threat of Iran
reacting to sanctions or other punitive moves with an attack against America,
orchestrated by Iran or its proxies or sympathizers in other countries. The
report states that the attack could come as a result of "our present
immigration policies, which favor vast in-flows of individuals, even from
nations known to harbor, or provide an ambient environment for, a whole host
of terrorist organizations and their affiliates." "Most Americans would be surprised by the
size of the flow of aliens that have continued to come into the United States
from countries of special interest to our homeland security since 9/11." According to the CIS, admissions of
"refugees and non-immigrants" from the 16 Muslim nations to the United States
numbered more than 300,000 in 2010 alone. They included 21,919 from Iran,
24,178 from Iraq, 30,735 from Lebanon, 63,250 from Pakistan, and 91,936 from
Saudi Arabia. In addition, 36,001 citizens of those
nations were granted lawful permanent resident alien status in 2010 --
obtained through marriage to a U.S. citizen, for example -- including 7,097
from Iran and 11,633 from Pakistan. From 2001 through 2010, the number of
non-immigrant and refugee admissions, plus lawful permanent resident alien
status grants, for people from the 16 countries has totaled 2,579,601. This
includes 285,641 from Iran, 151,210 from Iraq, 297,461 from Lebanon, 423,284 from
Saudi Arabia, 773,167 from Pakistan, and 105,425 from Syria. "It is noteworthy that during the decade
that ended in 2010, there were nearly 290,000 admissions of Iranians who made
their way to the United States, at a time when our two countries don't even
maintain diplomatic relations and we are still routinely referred to by the
supreme leader and the president of Iran as 'the Great Satan,'" the CIS
report states. Lebanon, home to designated terrorist
organization Hezbollah, sent even more aliens to our shores, with almost
300,000 admissions, according to the report. The CIS concludes: "If one were to expand
the list to include arrival flows from other, equally problematic countries
whose citizens pose special concerns to the United States, such as Nigeria,
Somalia, Sudan, Indonesia, and even Venezuela, the total would grow by many
millions. "There seems to be a disconnect in the
administration's thinking, an inability to . . . understand that U.S.
immigration policies have the capability to substantially strengthen, or to
significantly undermine, our national security." 5. More Than Half of World's
Population Now Lives in Cities The latest edition of the publication
Demographia World Urban Areas shows that the migration of rural people to
urban areas continues, with 26 of those areas now considered "megacities." "Around the world, people continue to seek
the promise of better economic outcomes in urban areas," the New Geography
website observes. "United Nations forecasts indicate that
another 2.5 billion people will be added to urban areas by 2050, while rural
areas will be reduced in population by 300 million. "The world's urban population is expected
to rise from today's nearly 53 percent of total population to 67 percent, and
more than 90 percent of the urban growth is expected to be in less developed
nations." Urban areas are defined by Demographia
World Urban Areas as areas of continuous urban development within a labor
market. They are not metropolitan areas, which can include non-urban or rural
territory. Urban areas in essence stretch beyond the confines of a city to
include all contiguous built-up areas. Megacities are urban areas with a
population greater than 10 million. Tokyo has been the world's largest urban
area since 1955, when it displaced New York, and it now has a population of
37.1 million. The second most populous urban area is
Jakarta, Indonesia, with 26 million, followed by Seoul-Incheon, South Korea,
with 22.5 million; Delhi, India (22.2 million); Manila, Philippines (21.9
million); and Shanghai, China (20.8 million). The most populous urban area in the United
States, New York, is seventh on the list with 20.4 million. Los Angeles is
No. 17 (14.9 million) and Chicago is No. 27 (10.7 million). The largest urban area in Europe is Moscow
(15.5 million), followed by Paris (10.7 million). The world's most densely populated urban
area is Dhaka, Bangladesh, which has 15.4 million people occupying a land
area of just 134 square miles, giving it a density of 115,000 per square
mile. Dhaka's slums, however, are estimated to
have a density of 2.7 million per square mile. At this density, all of the
world's 3.7 billion urban residents could be accommodated in an area about
the size of the Washington, D.C., urban area, according to New Geography. Surprisingly, New York has the lowest
density of any megacity, 4,600 per square mile. Atlanta is the least dense
urban area with a population over 2.5 million (1,800 per square mile), just
ahead of Boston (2,220). New York also reigns as the urban area with
the largest "urban footprint," or land area, with 4,495 square miles,
followed by Tokyo (3,300 square miles), Chicago (2,647), and Atlanta (2,645).
Among the megacities, Mumbai, India, has
the smallest land area after Dhaka, with 211 square miles. 6. We Heard... THAT New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo
is writing an autobiography expected to be published in 2014. Cuomo, who was elected in 2010, is working
on the book with his former secretary and political confidant Steve Cohen,
according to the New York Post. Interestingly, the Post is also reporting
that Fred Dicker, the paper's Albany bureau chief, has signed a deal to write
a biography of Cuomo scheduled for release next year, and he will have the
cooperation of the governor and his staff. THAT the phone-hacking scandal has not hurt
News Corporation's bottom line -- Rupert Murdoch's media
empire reported a 47 percent increase in profits in the quarter ending on
March 31. The company said its net income was $937
million in the quarter, up from $639 million in the same period a year
earlier, the New York Times' Media Decoder reported. The rise was largely attributable to gains
at cable television channels, including Fox News. The solid earnings came despite the $63
million News Corp. had to spend on hacking-related costs in the quarter, the
paidContent website reported. In the first nine months of fiscal 2012, the company spent $167 million on costs related to the closing of The News of the World in Britain last summer and other outlays related to the hacking scandal. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|

Union partisans in Congress may have failed to strip away secret ballot
elections when Right to Work supporters defeated the Card Check Forced Unionism
Bill.
But with tens of millions of dollars at stake, the union bosses aren't about
to give up. And they have now "convinced" some businesses
to help.
That's why your help is urgently needed today.
Just recently, in New York City, Marriott hotel officials entered into a
so-called "neutrality agreement" with New York Hotel & Motel
Trades Council Local 6 union organizers, allowing union militants unfettered
access to the employees in the workplace.
With the tacit approval of weak-kneed company officials, aggressive union
organizers embarked on a vicious campaign of intimidation -- including sexual
harassment.
Union officials used video cameras in an employee changing room, confiscated
employee personal property and verbally abused employees to coerce Marriott
workers into submitting to union-boss rule.
Bullying tactics like these are the backbone of Card Check campaigns, in
which workers are intimidated and harassed until they sign union authorization
cards.
Union militants even took photographs of front-desk clerk Gisel Rodriguez
without her consent while she was changing her uniform in an employee changing
room.
"I was wearing my uniform pants and my bra and holding my shirt to put it
on when they started snapping pictures," Rodriguez told the New York Post.
"I have no idea what [the union organizer] could be doing with the
pictures, and I think that's the worst part," she continued.
Despite the union thuggery, the Marriott workers stood firm in their resolve
to remain free of union-boss tyranny.
But the union boss siege continues.
Only now, these employees are fighting back with the help of their
attorneys, provided by the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.
Will you help us defend them?
Collusion like this between union organizers and company officials seems to
leave employees without defense.
But YOU stand with them through your support of the National Right to Work
Legal Defense Foundation.
With your help, the Foundation defends the right of workers to reject forced
unionism and to be free from union thuggery in the workplace.
When no one else will stand up for workers, your Foundation will.
And the Marriott employees are not alone in their strife.
>>> Chapman Medical Center in Orange County,
California served up healthcare workers on a silver platter to the Service
Employees International Union (SEIU) through a rigged Card Check
"vote."
Even though a majority of hospital workers rejected union membership and sent
signed cards, letters, and petitions rejecting the SEIU union bosses' so-called
"representation," union officials and hospital management have
started contract negotiations.
>>> Johnson Controls Inc. gave union thugs
employees' home addresses, personal contact information and access to
company property to facilitate a card check campaign.
>>> Verizon in Newport News, Virginia, continues to
divert union dues to the Communications Workers of America (CWA) through
its affiliate, Local 2205, from the paychecks of workers who, unwilling to walk
off their jobs during the destructive and acrimonious Verizon strike, revoked
their union membership.
If having your employer side with the union bosses
against you isn't bad enough, the Federal bureaucracy has teamed up with the
union bosses as well.
The Obama National Labor Relations Board instituted new rules that ambush
workers with quick-snap elections and open up workers to many of the abuses of
Card Check instant organizing.
Most ominously, by repealing the Foundation-won Dana precedent that granted
employees the right to demand a secret ballot election to remove an unwanted
union within 45 days of notice of Card Check recognition, the Obama Board
further opened the door for more abusive Card Check campaigns.
"We keep our eye on the prize," Pearce told the Associated Press.
Of course "the prize" is more forced dues to prop up Big Labor's
billion dollar political apparatus -- at a time when the union bosses are
preparing to unleash their biggest political spending blitz ever to reelect
President Obama.
The truth is, top down organizing starts at the very top -- at the National
Labor Relations Board.
That's why your help TODAY is so vital.
With your help, Foundation attorneys fight these top-down organizing schemes in
the courts and in the court of public opinion.
Foundation attorneys have filed legal challenges and lawsuits for these
victimized workers to protect their privacy and defend their right to be free
from union boss tyranny.
Opposing Big Labor's Card Check instant organizing is one of the most important
battles your Foundation has undertaken.
Without Foundation challenges to these Card Check schemes, hundreds of
thousands or even millions more workers may be squeezed under Big Labor's thumb
. . . forced to pay union bosses tribute to keep their jobs.
In addition to providing free legal aid to victims of Card Check abuse and
challenging the Obama Labor Board's bureaucratic maneuvers to expand top down
organizing, your Foundation must continue to expose these cases to the
mainstream media that has reported the so-called death of Card Check.
With the cadre of union bosses, employers and the federal bureaucracy arrayed
against workers, your help is urgently needed.
That's why I am asking you to stand with your Foundation TODAY in defense of
these workers and all workers who stand alone against forced-dues tyranny.
Please act today.
Sincerely,

Mark Mix

President Barack Obama's disastrous record on worker freedom speaks for itself,
but even he can stumble onto the truth.
The battle over Right to Work laws is "about politics," Obama told a
crowd of AFL-CIO union operatives this week. He's right. The battle for
employee freedom IS about politics.
Union bosses -- unlike any other private group -- enjoy the special
privilege under federal law to spend other people's money on politics -- and
even demand workers be fired for refusing to pay.
That's why Wisconsin and Indiana union bosses are desperate to undo Right to
Work laws that take away that power.
You see, union officials' self-reported numbers reveal they've spent over $2.4
BILLION on politics during the last two election cycles just from union coffers
funded primarily by dues paid by workers who would be fired if they didn't pay
up.
With the election season in high gear, all the early signs indicate that the
Big Labor bosses are ramping up their biggest forced-dues political spending
blitz in history.
Politicians like Barack Obama benefit from this corruption of the political
process, and the Obama Administration has returned the favor by ramming through
one power grab after another through the federal bureaucracy expanding union
bosses' power over rank-and-file workers.
I hope you understand what a profound threat we face this year. I'm
particularly concerned about the prospect of Big Labor's forced-dues political
machine targeting Right to Work supporters in key races next November.
Your National Right to Work Foundation is uniquely prepared to spring into
action immediately to stop Big Labor's illegal use of forced-dues cash to
advance its political agenda.
With the continued support of concerned citizens like you, the Foundation must
gird for battle right now and be ready to:
- Prosecute cases
against union activists who illegally seize and spend forced-dues money
to get their cronies elected and to lobby Congress and state legislatures
for bigger government, higher taxes, or more forced unionism privileges.
- Protect popular
state Right to Work laws that make union affiliation voluntary in 23
states. Union bosses are mounting end runs around these laws,
and they may try to wipe them completely off the map by repealing Section
14(b) of the federal Taft-Hartley Act.
- Expose Big
Labor's misdeeds. Every time Foundation
attorneys file charges against union bosses for breaking the law,
misappropriating union dues, or instigating violence against workers, the
Foundation hammers the union bosses in the press for their ugly abuses.
Meanwhile, your Foundation's pending case at the U.S.
Supreme Court -- for the over 30,000 non-union employees of the state of
California who were forced to fund a Big Labor "political fight back
fund" against their will -- could bring another vital precedent to protect
workers nationwide.
In 2012, with union bosses mounting their largest forced-dues political effort
in history, the Foundation must fight back with lawsuits, NLRB charges, FEC
complaints, exposure in the media...on every possible front.
But we can't do it without your continued support.
Sincerely,

Mark Mix
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|

A leaked memo reveals Wisconsin Democrats' and Big Labor's battle plan for the
June 5 recall election. Their campaign strategy: Don't talk about
Wisconsin's government-sector Right to Work law.
One Democrat even admitted that the issue "isn't moving people" to
their side.
There's a simple reason for that.
Right to Work is popular with the people of Wisconsin - and Governor
Walker's reforms are paying off.
And now the union bosses are desperate to talk about anything else. But your
National Right to Work Committee won't let them get away with sweeping the
issue under the rug.
We're prepared to put Right to Work front and center in the recall campaign,
but we need your help.
The action of concerned citizens like you has repeatedly paid off in this
lengthy battle.
Over a year ago, your support helped encourage Governor Walker and the
legislature to stay the course and pass the bill over the outrageous protests,
teacher union "sick outs," and a Democrat legislative walkout.
Your Committee alerted and mobilized Wisconsin citizens when Big Labor tried to
hijack an election for the State Supreme Court, and later when they tried to
restore a pro-forced unionism majority in the State Senate.
Despite a $20 million campaign to recall supporters of the government-sector
Right to Work law last summer, Big Labor-backed challengers in the recall
election were terrified to even mention the forced-dues issue.
We blitzed those districts with three separate mailings totaling almost
200,000 pieces of mail, making sure constituents knew where each candidate
stood on forced dues, and asking them to call the pro-forced unionism
politicians and demand they change their ways - and we followed that with
emails and phone calls.
The people of Wisconsin took care of the rest. In the end, only two of the six
Republicans lost - but neither lost because of their support for Governor
Walker's reform bill.
One Republican who lost had been dogged by a tawdry infidelity scandal, yet his
union-label opponent only scraped by with 51 percent of the vote - hardly a
rebuke of employee freedom.
Another union hierarchy-backed candidate won in District 32, where Barack Obama
overwhelmingly won in 2008 with 61 percent of the vote.
Without the generosity and commitment of Right to Work supporters in these
battles, the union bosses and their allies may have succeeded in their schemes
to take over the Wisconsin Supreme Court and retake the State Senate with
forced-unionism proponents.
And now that the union bosses and their allies are gearing up to spend even
more in their desperate attempt to recall Scott Walker, those of us who support
worker freedom must fight back.
Tens of thousands of Right to Work supporters nationwide have signed Letters of
Encouragement for Governor Walker, but that's only one step.
We've got to be ready to once again bring worker freedom front and center in
the campaign.
You see, Big Labor and their puppet politicians don't want Wisconsin voters to
think about Right to Work or how the reforms are already paying off:
- The Kaukauna
School Board relied on the reforms to turn a $400,000 deficit into a $1.5
million surplus, hire more teachers, and
reduce class sizes without the burdensome meddling of teacher union
bosses;
- School districts
across the state are projected to save millions of dollars each year
by shopping around for competitively priced health insurance providers;
- Milwaukee Mayor
Tom Barrett, one of the Democrats vying for the chance to oppose Governor
Walker in the June 5 recall, publicly admitted
that his city would save "at least $25 million a year -- and
potentially as much as $36 million in 2012."
Instead, the union bosses want to hoodwink the voters
and pretend the election isn't about restoring Big Labor's dominance in
Madison.
It's vital we do everything we can to prevent a union-boss takeover in
Wisconsin because this election could send shockwaves from coast to coast.
You see, even though the Democrats and union bosses aren't talking about the
labor law reforms now, if they end up taking out Governor Walker in the recall
election, they'll turn around and scream at the top of their lungs that the
election really was about Right to Work.
They want to frighten elected officials and grassroots activists and stop the
growing Right to Work movement in its tracks.
We won't let that happen.
Your National Right to Work Committee is prepared to turn up the heat - mail,
phones, email and internet ads, radio, even TV ads if funding permits - to
inform Wisconsin voters about the effects of the reforms and where the
candidates stand.
But we need help from concerned citizens like you to bring this plan into
action.
It's crucial we not let the union bosses drown out the voices of those who
support worker freedom.
Your action was critical in encouraging Governor Walker to stand up to Big
Labor one year ago, and I know I can continue to count on you going forward.
And you can count on your Committee - just as we did during the legislative
battle, the judicial election, and the State Senate recalls - to make sure the
issue of worker freedom versus forced-union dues isn't swept under the rug.
I hope you'll act right away.
Sincerely,

Mark Mix
| Solar X-rays: Geomagnetic Field: |

















